The Research Behind It
When we're discussing this we are talking exclusively about the National Institutes of Health and more specifically the PubMed site for soft peer review. When we began our initial research via the internet the quality of content available was relatively low. Not demonstrably false but not particularly informative either. Most things being pawned off as information are almost always part of some site that wishes to sell you something. The "information" is just a means to get you there. That is what makes the NIH so fundamentally different in this regard. For starters they do in fact know what they are talking about, but beyond even that is the fact that the research paper they have spent years to compile, IS their product. They have no other motive in mind by providing us with this information. That allowed for a "generally regarded as true" status over all the information that was available on any given subject. That is an ocean of information. We have included links here to some of the most important research we were exposed to. The list would be obnoxious if we included them all and copyright agreements between firms on the subject prevent some from being mentioned outright. Still we felt it was important to give you a nice sample a "walking tour" if you will. These links are here for your own use and enlightenment enjoy.
